The Bunny Bacchus (mr_wombat) wrote,
The Bunny Bacchus

I dunnow

But this sounds a little dodgy to me. Marketing an eight year old child as an adult for magazine covers and fashion shoots.
I mean I know you can't stop doing everything that might maybe be used in an illegitimate fashion (if that were the case then cosmo should have been banned here along with playboy all those years back) then you'd be left with little to do, and I wouldn't suggest that pictures of that kind are going to cause the streets to flood with paedophiles from all walks of life but shit people, but this at least feels like a step towards legitimising material of that type.
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.