Log in

No account? Create an account

Wed, Feb. 22nd, 2006, 01:02 pm
Mr Wombat Ponders

Fatal, possibly the worst RPG ever made (as famously reviewed here has not improved one iota, despite claims to the contrary from the fanboys - its still a horribly mysogynistic piece of crap but now has the benefit of horribly mysogynistic artwork too.
So I wonder if, in the style of the Pete Doherty hoax hoax what would happen if someone were to set out to write something even worse. I'd be curious about it as an experiment but only if there were some way to, a year or so down the line once it gained noteriety, harshly punish every jackass who praised it.

Thu, Feb. 23rd, 2006 10:33 am (UTC)

It does sort of make you wonder - I mean the guy was in his mid 20s or later when he did that rebuttal and supposedly an intelligent bloke (self proclaimed mind) and he's making comments like

Original review: Fatal is the date rape RPG
Him: Again, another mistake, where is dating mentioned in the book?

The laughable bit is that the fans/social deviants/apologists claim the book has gotten better yet the starting age for humans is still something like 8D10,000/81,818, vagnial/anal circumference is still a generatable stat and the urination skill is still there and pretty much EVERYTHING revolves around sex.